The real church: Divine teleology versus contemporary individual sanctity
PROTECTED CONTENT
If you’re a current subscriber, log in below. If you would like to subscribe, please click the subscribe tab above.
Username and Password Help
Please enter your email and we will send you a password reset link.
Billy Howard
The institution of the Church, in its original design, was conceived not merely as a place of worship but as a radically functional community; the living and cohesive “Body of Christ.” This foundational teleology, its intended purpose, stands in stark contrast to how many individuals today approach its sanctity, often viewing it through a lens of private utility and consumerist detachment. Analyzing this dichotomy reveals a significant divergence between the divine ideal of communal mission and the modern reality of spiritual individualism.
The Lord’s design, rooted in the Greco-Christian concept of koinonia (fellowship, sharing), emphasized radical self-abandonment and mutual interdependence. As outlined in Pauline epistles, the Church was to function as a unified organism (1 Corinthians 12), where sanctity was expressed not in passive observation but in sacrificial action: providing for the needy, pursuing social justice, and collectively bearing witness to the Gospel. The holiness of the institution was inherently tied to its public, transformative mission and its internal, selfless love (agape). Membership was an active vow of participatory suffering and joy, transforming the world by its sheer existence as an alternative society, an existential anchor where all members were co-laborers, not just observers.
By contrast, the modern individual’s approach frequently reframes the Church as a spiritual service provider. The sanctity of the institution often becomes externalized-vested in sacred architecture, immutable dogma, and ritualistic performances-rather than internalized within the active, ethical lives of its members. This shift is driven by pervasive cultural individualism, which encourages a “What do I get out of this?” consumer mindset. The church is valued instrumentally: for spiritual comfort, moral guidance, social networking, or even emotional entertainment. Consequently, attendance can become a transaction, and sanctity is reduced to the maintenance of religious rituals or the physical protection of the institution, rather than the radical, communal selflessness intended by its founder.
This divergence creates a substantial challenge in sustaining the original mission. When the focus shifts from a collective, outward-facing mission to an individualized, inward-facing comfort, the spiritual vitality of the organism wanes. The sanctity of the early Church was found in its unity and its vulnerability, when its members were set apart for the world, not from it, tasked with healing societal brokenness. Today, many individuals approach sanctity as a form of separation, using the institution as a barrier against perceived moral contamination from the outside world. This often translates into judgment, passive detachment, or a withdrawal into internal spiritual exclusivity, ultimately eroding the very communal bonds and outward missionary imperative that defined the Lord’s initial blueprint.
To bridge this gap, the modern approach must recognize that the institution’s sanctity resides in its function as a collective agent of transformation. Reclaiming the Church’s original design demands a re-engagement with the sacrificial and communal nature of faith, moving from treating the Church as a disposable utility to embracing it as a unified body dedicated to costly, co-operative participation. This shift from reception to contribution is essential to restoring the Church’s original spiritual and societal relevance. I could be wrong but it’s just something to consider.
To pose a question, comment, or share your opinion about this opinion, you can reach Howard at bg@authorbghoward.com or P. O. Box 8103, Jacksonville, FL 32239.
